查看: 2868|回复: 1

[学习资料] 在波动的市场中如何达到最佳的饲料性能?

[复制链接]
发表于 2013-11-1 16:26:52 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
 
11.jpg

  正确使用酶和植酸盐,增加生产,节省饲料成本。
  尽管原料成本上涨,波动,但肉鸡养殖者必须要依据生长和均匀度的双重要求来满足性能目标。
  在肉鸡的生产周期中,许多因素会影响它们实现饲料潜在的代谢能(ME)全部发挥。日粮和环境中的变化以及遗传学都发挥作用。然而,家禽养殖者的主要挑战是在饲料消化率和它对动物生产力的影响。
  尽管原料成本在上涨和波动,但生产者必须依据动物生长和鸡群均匀度来继续满足性能目标。这些挑战可在替代原料和副产品使用大幅上升的情况中看到,替代品如DDGS,米糠,菜籽粕,双低油菜籽粕,葵花粕,棕榈仁粕和麦糠。
  在饲料配方中添加这些替代品会产生一系列的挑战:维持营养的充足以及抗营养因子的处理。与更多传统的饲料原料相比,这些材料的挑战主要是它们的组成,一般是淀粉和蛋白含量低,而且有更高水平的抗营养因子如阿拉伯木聚糖和植酸。
  抗营养因子的问题
  不溶性阿拉伯木聚糖是植物细胞壁的结构成分,单胃动物对它们的消化率很差。不溶性阿拉伯木聚糖含量的提高将会产生屏障,阻碍内源性酶储存蛋白质、淀粉和脂肪的功能。它们也一直与增加食糜粘度,减慢运输时间,降低营养物质消化率和肠道菌群的不良变化有关系。结合这些特点产生负面影响动物的生产性能和肠道健康的影响。这些不良效应会给动物生产性能和肠道健康带来负面影响。
  植酸盐是另外一种强大的抗营养物质,它与矿物质,淀粉和蛋白质结合,提高它们抵抗消化的能力。这会增加回肠氨基酸回流率,反过来就会为病原体生长提供基质。
  植酸未水解也会为环境带来负担,因为它会导致更大的磷污染和较高的粪便管理和法律规范成本。为了说明挑战的深度,我们知道42天龄的肉鸡日粮中大约45%的磷都从粪便中排出。如果我们认为仅仅在美国就有6000万的肉鸡饲养者,每年生产90亿肉鸡,累计磷的排泄量达到了惊人的115,000吨/年。减少美国肉鸡磷的排泄对环境的影响是相当大的。
  处理变化
  栽培方法和收割条件会改变作物的成分含量, 反过来也会相似地影响消化率,性能和环境
  栽培方法和收割条件会改变作物的成分含量, 反过来也会相似地影响消化率,性能和环境。以玉米为例,它是全球最常见的饲料粮,但是其饲料价值是公认的量值,有时候仅仅是粘性可变,如小麦。
  从简单的玉米-大豆型日粮演变到复杂的,包含了各种替代原料,以此降低饲料成本,这对动物消化的日粮版块产生了重大的影响。
  例如,添加更多蛋白和能量源会使粗纤维(NDF,ADF和阿拉伯木聚糖酶)以及植酸含量,同时降低日粮中的淀粉含量。可消化氨基酸,是日粮中氨基酸的一部分,也会被降低。为了在每千克日粮成本降低时维持动物的性能,有必要克服这一结合效应造成的单个营养挑战。
  解决方案取决于酶
  传统中外源性酶可以为相对简单的日粮提供价值,它们可通过增加营养消化率,同时抵抗原料的变异性来改善动物的性能和均匀性。随着日粮变得越来越复杂和质量呈现多样性,人们普遍承认,酶的使用变得更加宝贵。
  植酸酶提供了一种消除植酸盐抗营养作用,提高其消化率的相对便宜,经济实惠的方式,这也通过减少骨骼问题来改善了动物的福利。最新的巴提奥杆菌菌植酸酶可提供超过大肠杆菌当量的额外好处,包括:在进入消化道前期更高的活力,最小化植酸盐的抗营养作用,最大化营养消化吸收的活力时间。使用传统和新生代植酸酶的好处是降低了粪便中磷的排泄。
  酶,植酸酶组合产生利益
  糖酶和适量的植酸酶结合也可从根本上改善复杂的日粮性能,减少整体生产成本。
  如果我们查看一下,例如,将木聚糖酶,淀粉酶和蛋白酶与植酸酶的顶部结合,其效应是惊人的:
  ·木聚糖酶 (X) 可分解非淀粉多糖(NSPs)如日粮中可溶性和不溶性的阿拉伯糖基木聚糖,降低有粘性谷物如小麦的食糜粘度,释放先前被阻碍的营养物质。
  ·淀粉酶 (A) 提高了淀粉的水解,改善了消化率,补充了内源性淀粉酶的分泌。
  ·蛋白酶通过水解储存的和结构蛋白,打破蛋白质和日粮中淀粉以及纤维的结合,提高了蛋白质消化率。此外,它作用于日粮中的抗营养因子如储存在豆粕和其他植物蛋白中的胰蛋白酶抑制剂和凝集素。
  使用这些酶结合标准计量的巴提奥杆菌植酸酶,养殖者可实现一致的饲料质量和体重/热量转换,每百万家禽可节省$80,000到$100,000的成本。
  观察外源性酶组合(如木聚糖酶,淀粉酶和蛋白酶)和其他饲料添加剂如何与新生代生物有效植酸酶作用,确保性能和成本可在波动的市场行情中创造利益,这将是很重要的。
  两位作者都是资深的动物营养学家。
  英文发表在2013年11月的 Feed Management杂志上。
  译者:IRIS
 How to achieve optimum feed performance in a volatile market
  在反复无常的市场中如何达到最佳的饲料性能?
  日期: 2013-10-14
  作者: Duke Barnard 和Luis Romero, Danisco动物营养公司


该贴已经同步到 007畜牧的微博
中国畜牧人网站微信公众号
版权声明:本文内容来源互联网,仅供畜牧人网友学习,文章及图片版权归原作者所有,如果有侵犯到您的权利,请及时联系我们删除(010-82893169-805)。
 楼主| 发表于 2013-11-1 16:29:12 | 显示全部楼层
  英文原文:During the production cycle of a broiler, many factors influence a bird's ability to achieve the full metabolizable energy (ME) potential of the feed. Changes in diet and environment -- as well as its genetics -- can play a role. However, poultry producers' main challenge is the variance in feed digestibility and its impact on animal productivity.

  Producers must continue to meet performance objectives, in terms of both growth and flock uniformity, despite increases and volatility in raw material costs (see Figure 1). This challenge has seen an increase in the use of alternative ingredients and byproducts in poultry feed such as DDGS, rice bran, rapeseed meal, canola meal, sunflower meal, palm kernel meal and wheat pollard.

  Inclusion of these alternative raw materials in feed formulations introduced a complete set of challenges: maintaining the nutrient specification of the diet and managing anti-nutrient factors. Compared to more traditional feed ingredients, the challenges of these materials are highlighted by their composition as they tend to be lower in both starch and protein quality and have higher levels of anti-nutrient factors, e.g. arabinoxylans and phytate.

  Problems with anti-nutrients

  Insoluble arabinoxylans are structural components of the cell walls of plant that are poorly digested by monogastric animals. Increased levels insoluble arabinoxylans produce a barrier for endogenous enzyme activity on storage proteins, starch and fat. They have also been associated with increased digesta viscosity, slower transit time, lower nutrient digestibility and undesirable shifts in gut microbiota. The combined effects of these characteristics negatively impact animal performance and gut health.

  Phytate is another potent anti-nutrient. It binds minerals, starch and proteins, increasing their resistance to digestion. This can lead to increased ileal amino acid flow which, in turn, provides substrates that can encourage pathogen growth.

  Failing to hydrolyse phytate also carries an environmental burden as it leads to a greater threat of phosphorous pollution and higher manure management and legislative compliance costs. To exemplify the extent of the challenge, roughly 45 percent of all phosphorous consumed in the normal diet of a 42-day-old broiler is excreted in manure. If we consider that the United States alone produces 60 million broiler breeders and 9 billion broilers every year, the cumulative phosphorus excretion reaches a staggering 115,000 metric tons/year. The environmental impact of reducing phosphorous for for U.S. broilers is considerable.

  Cultivation methods and harvest conditions can produce varying feed substrate levels, which in turn lead to similar digestibility, performance and environmental issues. Corn, for example, is the most common feed grain used globally, but its feed value is universally recognized as being variable -- sometimes just as variable as viscous grains such as wheat.

  Moving from simple corn-soy based diets to more complex ones, which include a variety of alternative raw materials to reduce feed costs, has a significant effect on the dietary substrates available for digestion by the animal.

  For example, the inclusion of a wider variety of protein and energy sources produces a corresponding increase in fiber (NDF, ADF and arabinoxylans) and phytate levels and decreases in starch in the diet (see Figure 2). Digestible amino acids, expressed as a proportion of total amino acids in the diet, also decreases. This combination of effects creates unique nutritional challenges that need to be overcome in order for animal performance to be maintained while reducing costs per kg gain.

  The solution lies with enzymes

  Exogenous enzymes have traditionally offered value in relatively simple diets. They improve animal performance and uniformity by increasing nutrient digestibility while counteracting variability in raw materials. As diets become increasingly complex and the quality more variable, it is generally acknowledged that enzyme usage becomes even more valuable.

  Phytase offers a relatively cheap, affordable way to eliminate the anti-nutritive effect of phytate and maximize its digestibility, which also improves animal welfare by reducing the risk of skeletal problems. The latest Buttiauxella-based phytase offers additional benefits over E. Coli equivalents, including: much higher activity earlier in the digestive tract, minimization of the anti-nutrient effects of phytate and maximization of the time available for nutrient digestion and absorption. An added benefit of using both traditional and new generation phytases is their ability to reduce phosphorus in manure.

  Enzyme, phytase combination produce benefits

  The combination of carbohydrase enzymes with the right amount of phytase can also radically improve complex diet performance and slash overall production costs.

  If we look, for example, at combining xylanase, amylase and protease enzymes on top of phytase, the results are dramatic:

  Xylanase (X) breaks down the non-starch polysaccharides (NSPs) such as soluble and insoluble arabinoxylans in the feed reducing digesta viscosity in viscous grains such as wheat and releasing previously trapped nutrients.

  Amylase (A) increases the hydrolysis of starch improving its digestibility, and complements the secretion of endogenous amylases.

  Protease increases protein digestibility by hydrolysis of storage and structural proteins, and disrupts interactions of proteins with starch and fiber in the diet. Additionally, it targets other anti-nutritional factors in the diet, e.g. residual trypsin inhibitors and lectins in soybean meal and some other vegetable proteins.

  Using this combination with a standard dose of Buttiauxella-based phytase, producers can achieve consistent feed quality and body weight/calorie conversion improvements to save between $80,000 to $100,000 per million birds.

  Observing how exogenous enzyme combinations (e.g. xylanase, amylase and protease) and other feed additives interact with the new generation of bio-efficacious phytases will be important to ensure that performance and cost benefits are delivered despite volatile market conditions.

  References on request from info.animalnutrition@dupont.com.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

发布主题 快速回复 返回列表 联系我们

关于社区|广告合作|联系我们|帮助中心|小黑屋|手机版| 京公网安备 11010802025824号

北京宏牧伟业网络科技有限公司 版权所有(京ICP备11016518号-1

Powered by Discuz! X3.4  © 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc. GMT+8, 2024-4-27 02:43, 技术支持:温州诸葛云网络科技有限公司