查看: 2484|回复: 6

[繁殖育种] 关于奶牛性控精液问题!!

  [复制链接]
发表于 2010-6-5 13:57:31 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
我个人没什么经验主要想发个贴看看大家的说法!!关于性控精液跟普通精液性价比(长远利益来看)!!再讨论一下受精率的问题我发的贴的目的学习学习再学习!!先谢谢大家踊跃发言!!!

李浩1415 于 2010-6-5 13:59 补充以下内容

补充一下还有后代产奶量谢谢啊!!
中国畜牧人网站微信公众号

评分

参与人数 1论坛币 +1 收起 理由
立佳 + 1

查看全部评分

版权声明:本文内容来源互联网,仅供畜牧人网友学习,文章及图片版权归原作者所有,如果有侵犯到您的权利,请及时联系我们删除(010-82893169-805)。
发表于 2010-6-5 14:14:47 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 lzrn 于 2010-6-5 14:51 编辑

有道理 好好把握,好东西多交流总结

评分

参与人数 1论坛币 +10 收起 理由
system + 10 第一个回复系统自动奖励

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-6-5 22:24:04 | 显示全部楼层
扩群就用性控
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-6-7 11:49:47 | 显示全部楼层
奶牛性控精液受胎率要低一些:wulai:
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-6-9 21:30:04 | 显示全部楼层
跟踪配种效果能好些。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-6-10 19:18:31 | 显示全部楼层
选择优秀的性控冻精在扩群时和优秀核心群的建立时使用是有必要的。受胎率可能会略低于常规冻精。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-6-13 21:52:23 | 显示全部楼层
刚好有篇关于性控精液的文章,感兴趣可以下载看一看Sex-sorted semen for dairy heifers: Effects on reproductive and lactational performances
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of using sex-sorted semen for first AI of heifers on health and productivity during first lactation. Holstein heifers (herd A=227 and herd B=1,144) received first artificial insemination (AI) with sex-sorted semen (SX; n=343) or conventional semen (CS; n=1,028), and all heifers that displayed estrus after first AI were reinseminated with conventional semen up to 11 times before being culled. Age at first AI was 13.1±0.1 and 13.8±0.1 mo for SX and CS heifers, respectively, in herd A and 12.9±0.1 mo for both SX and CS heifers in herd B. Pregnancy per AI after first AI was greater for CS heifers than for SX heifers (51.8 vs. 40.2%). From heifers initially enrolled, 70.2% calved in herds A (n=188) or B (n=774) and first-lactation data were collected. Interval from first AI to calving was greater for SX heifers than for CS heifers (10.2±0.1 vs. 9.9±0.1 mo). Among heifers conceiving to first AI, SX heifers were more likely than CS heifers to deliver a female calf (85.7 vs. 47.7%), but because SX heifers were more likely to deliver a dead calf (8.8 vs. 3.4%), the difference in proportion of SX and CS heifers delivering a live female calf was smaller than expected (SX=79.1%; CS=47.2%). Rearing cost from first AI to calving was greater for SX heifers than for CS heifers ($775.3±6.7 vs. $750.0±5.9), but calf revenue tended to be greater for SX heifers ($142.0±7.2 vs. $126.7±6.4) and cost per female calf produced was smaller for SX heifers than for CS heifers ($−809.4±10.8 vs. $−1,249.7±10.9). Treatment did not affect calving difficulty, proportion of heifers needing assistance, and incidence of retained fetal membranes or metritis. Among heifers that conceived to first AI, however, SX heifers were more likely to be culled within 30 DIM (3.3 vs. 1.6%) and tended to be more likely to be culled within 60 DIM (5.5 vs. 3.4%) than CS heifers, but overall replacement cost was not different ($136.8±13.4). Total milk yield (9,245.5±84.7kg) and income over feed cost ($554.7±5.1) were not different. Overall economic return was greater for SX heifers than CS heifers ($−83.7±36.7 vs. −175.3±33.4). Use of sex-sorted semen for first insemination of virgin heifers reduced the cost per female calf produced and increased the economic return during the first lactation.
http://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(10)00252-3/abstract
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

发布主题 快速回复 返回列表 联系我们

关于社区|广告合作|联系我们|帮助中心|小黑屋|手机版| 京公网安备 11010802025824号

北京宏牧伟业网络科技有限公司 版权所有(京ICP备11016518号-1

Powered by Discuz! X3.5  © 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc. GMT+8, 2025-5-10 18:41, 技术支持:温州诸葛云网络科技有限公司